<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="JATS-archive-oasis-article1-4.xsd" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="ru">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Журнал Научное обозрение. Педагогические науки</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn>2500-3402</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Общество с ограниченной ответственностью &amp;quot;Издательский Дом &amp;quot;Академия Естествознания&amp;quot;</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17513/srps.2468</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ART-2468</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>ПОСЛЕДСТВИЯ ШКОЛЬНОЙ ТРАВЛИ ДЛЯ СВИДЕТЕЛЕЙ</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name-alternatives>
            <name xml:lang="ru">
              <surname>Щербаков</surname>
              <given-names>В.В.</given-names>
            </name>
          </name-alternatives>
          <name-alternatives>
            <name xml:lang="en">
              <surname>Scherbakov</surname>
              <given-names>V.V.</given-names>
            </name>
          </name-alternatives>
          <email>slavalamet@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7004a59c"/>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff7004a59c">
        <institution xml:lang="ru">Федеральный научно-методический центр в области психологии и педагогики толерантности</institution>
        <institution xml:lang="en">Federal Scientific and Methodological Center in the field of psychology and pedagogy of tolerance</institution>
      </aff>
      <pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-01-03">
        <day>03</day>
        <month>01</month>
        <year>2023</year>
      </pub-date>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>36</fpage>
      <lpage>41</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
          <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="url" hreflang="ru">https://science-pedagogy.ru/ru/article/view?id=2468</self-uri>
      <abstract xml:lang="ru" lang-variant="original" lang-source="author">
        <p>В статье анализируется международный опыт исследований свидетелей буллинга. Проблеме травли посвящено много исследований, в том числе подробно изучены последствия травли для жертв и агрессоров. В то же самое время последствия травли для свидетелей остаются малоизучены, несмотря на то, что именно им отведена главная роль в большинстве антибуллинговых программ, как самой многочисленной группе лиц, участвующих в буллинге и способной предотвратить или остановить его. В статье автором ставится цель – обобщить зарубежный исследовательский опыт изучения свидетелей травли и ее последствий для них. Для наглядности данных автором рассматривается возникновение негативных последствий школьной травли для свидетелей, через призму возникающих у них когнитивных искажений, которые в ситуации травли, с одной стороны, выступают защитным механизмом для свидетелей, с другой, напротив – оказывают негативное влияние на свидетелей: когнитивного диссонанса, морального отчуждения ответственности, генерализации, катастрофизации и персонализации. Проанализировав данные, автор приходит к выводу, что школьная травля оказывает краткосрочное, а также долгосрочное негативное влияние на психическое и физическое здоровье свидетелей, а также существенно повышает риск суицидального и самоповреждающего поведения свидетелей, в том числе способствует повышению риска употребления ПАВ.</p>
      </abstract>
      <abstract xml:lang="en" lang-variant="translation" lang-source="translator">
        <p>The article analyzes the international experience of bullying witnesses research. Much research has been devoted to the problem of bullying, including the consequences of bullying for victims and aggressors. At the same time, the consequences of bullying for witnesses remain poorly understood, despite the fact that they are assigned the main role in most anti-bullying programs, as the largest group of people involved in bullying and able to prevent or stop it. In our article, we aim to summarize foreign research experience in studying witnesses of bullying and its consequences for them. To illustrate the data, we consider the occurrence of negative consequences of school bullying for witnesses, through the prism of their cognitive distortions, which in a situation of bullying, on the one hand, act as a protective mechanism for witnesses, on the other hand, on the contrary, have a negative impact on witnesses: cognitive dissonance, moral alienation responsibility, generalization, catastrophization and personalization. By analyzing the data, we can see that school bullying has short-term as well as long-term negative effects on the mental and physical health of bystanders, and significantly increases the risk of bystanders’ suicidal and self-injurious behavior, including the increased risk of substance use.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="ru">
        <kwd>буллинг</kwd>
        <kwd>последствия буллинга</kwd>
        <kwd>последствия буллинга для свидетеля</kwd>
        <kwd>свидетель буллинга</kwd>
        <kwd>травма свидетеля</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>bullying</kwd>
        <kwd>consequences of bullying</kwd>
        <kwd>consequences of bullying for a witness</kwd>
        <kwd>witness of bullying</kwd>
        <kwd>trauma of a witness</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>1. Salmivalli C. Participant roles in bullying: How can peer bystanders be utilized in interventions? Theory into practice. 2014. Vol. 53. Is. 4. P. 286–292.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>2. Бочавер А. А. Последствия школьной травли для ее участников // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2021. Vol. 18. Is. 2. с. 393–409.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>3. Bauman S., Yoon J., Iurino C., Hackett L. Experiences of adolescent witnesses to peer victimization: The bystander effect. Journal of school psychology. 2020. Vol. 80. P. 1–14.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>4. Gini G., Pozzoli T. Bullied children and psychosomatic problems: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2013. Vol. 132. Is. 4. P. 720–729.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>5. Darney C., Howcroft G., Stroud L. The impact that bullying at school has on an individual’s self-esteem during young adulthood. International Journal of Education and Research. 2013. Vol. 1. Is. 8. P. 1–16.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>6. Baldry A.C., Farrington D.P., Sorrentino A. School bullying and cyberbullying among boys and girls: Roles and overlap. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment &amp; Trauma. 2017. Vol. 26. Is. 9. P. 937–951.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>7. Boyes M.E., Bowes L., Cluver L., Ward C. Bullying victimisation, internalising symptoms, and conduct problems in South African children and adolescents: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of abnormal child psychology. 2014. Vol. 42. Is. 8. P. 1313–1324.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>8. Lambe L., Hudson C., Craig W., Pepler D. Does defending come with a cost? Examining the psychosocial correlates of defending behaviour among bystanders of bullying in a Canadian sample. Child Abuse &amp; Neglect. 2017. Vol. 65. P. 112–123.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>9. Deng N., Bi H., Zhang W. Bystander behavior of adolescents in school bullying: A family functioning perspective. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal. 2021. Vol. 49. Is. 8. P. 1–15.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>10. Ttofi M., Maria M., Farrington D., David P., Lösel F., Crago F., Rebecca V., Theodorakis N. School bullying and drug use later in life: A meta-analytic investigation. School psychology quarterly. 2016. Vol. 31. Is. 1. P. 8.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>11. Twemlow S.W., Sacco F.C., Williams P. Perspective on the bully-victim-bystander relationship. Clinic. 1996. Vol. 60. Is. 31. P. 296–313.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>12. Crosnoe R. Schools, peers, and the big picture of adolescent development. Adolescent vulnerabilities and opportunities. 2011. P. 182–204.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>13. Midgett A., Doumas D.M. The impact of a brief bullying bystander intervention on depressive symptoms. Journal of Counseling &amp; Development. 2019. Vol. 97. Is. 3. P. 270–280.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>14. Howard A.M., Landau S., Pryor J.B. Peer bystanders to bullying: Who wants to play with the victim? Journal of abnormal child psychology. 2014. Vol. 42. Is. 2. P. 265–276.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>15. Rivers I., Poteat V.P., Noret N., Ashurst N. Observing bullying at school: The mental health implications of witness status. School Psychology Quarterly. 2009. Vol. 24. Is. 4. P. 211.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>16. Glover D., Gough G., Johnson M., Cartwright N. Bullying in 25 secondary schools: Incidence, impact and intervention. Educational research. 2000. Vol. 42. Is. 2. P. 141–156.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>17. Matthews T., Danese A., Wertz J., Ambler A., Kelly M., Diver A., Caspi A., Moffitt T., Arseneault L. Social isolation and mental health at primary and secondary school entry: a longitudinal cohort study. Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry. 2015. Vol. 54. Is. 3. P. 225–232.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>18. Wu W.C., Luu S., Luh D.L. Defending behaviors, bullying roles, and their associations with mental health in junior high school students: a population-based study. BMC Public Health. 2016. Vol. 16. Is. 1. P. 1–10.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>19. Callaghan M., Kelly C., Molcho M. Bullying and bystander behaviour and health outcomes among adolescents in Ireland. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019. Vol. 73. Is. 5. P. 416–421.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>20. Bjarehed M., Thornberg R., Wänström L., Gini G. Mechanisms of moral disengagement and their associations with indirect bullying, direct bullying, and pro-aggressive bystander behavior. The Journal of Early Adolescence. 2020. Vol. 40. Is. 1. P. 28–55.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>21. Killer B., Bussey K., Hawes D., Hunt C. A metaanalysis of the relationship between moral disengagement and bullying roles in youth. Aggressive behavior. 2019. Vol. 45. Is. 4. P. 450–462.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>22. Caravita S., Sijtsema J., Rambaran J., Gini G. Peer influences on moral disengagement in late childhood and early adolescence. Journal of youth and adolescence. 2014. Vol. 43. Is. 2. P. 193–207.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>23. Thornberg R., Jungert T. School bullying and the mechanisms of moral disengagement. Aggressive behavior. 2014. Vol. 40. Is. 2. P. 99–108.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>24. Thornberg R., Tenenbaum L., Varjas K., Meyers J., Jungert T., Vanegas G. Bystander motivation in bullying incidents: To intervene or not to intervene? Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2012. Vol. 13. Is. 3. P. 247.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>25. D’Augelli A.R., Pilkington N.W., Hershberger S.L. Incidence and mental health impact of sexual orientation victimization of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths in high school. School Psychology Quarterly. 2002. Vol. 17. Is. 2. P. 148.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>26. Twemlow S.W., Sacco F.C. How &amp; why does bystanding have such a startling impact on the architecture of school bullying and violence? International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies. 2013. Vol. 10. Is. 3. P. 289–306.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>27. Adewoye S.E., du Plessis A. Early adolescent bystanders’ experiences of school bullying in a South African school. Journal of Education (University of KwaZulu-Natal). 2021. Is. 85. P. 111–127.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>28. Smokowski P.R., Kopasz K.H. Bullying in school: An overview of types, effects, family characteristics, and intervention strategies. Children &amp; Schools. 2005. Vol. 27. Is. 2. P. 101–110.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>29. Glew G.M., Fan M., Katon W., Rivara F., Kernic M. Bullying, psychosocial adjustment, and academic performance in elementary school. Archives of pediatrics &amp; adolescent medicine. 2005. Vol. 159. Is. 11. P. 1026–1031</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>30. Farrington D.P., Ttofi M.M. Bullying as a predictor of offending, violence and later life outcomes. Criminal behaviour and mental health. 2011. Vol. 21. Is. 2. P. 90–98.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>31. Vidourek R.A., King K.A., Merianos A.L. School bullying and student trauma: Fear and avoidance associated with victimization. Journal of Prevention &amp; Intervention in the Community. 2016. Vol. 44. Is. 2. P. 121–129.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>32. Strøm I.F., Thoresen S., Wentzel-Larsen T., Grete Dyb. Violence, bullying and academic achievement: A study of 15-year-old adolescents and their school environment. Child abuse &amp; neglect. 2013. Vol. 37. Is. 4. P. 243–251.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>33. Midgett A., Doumas D.M. Witnessing bullying at school: The association between being a bystander and anxiety and depressive symptoms. School mental health. 2019. Vol. 11. Is. 3. P. 454–463.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>34. Rivers I., Noret N. Potential suicide ideation and its association with observing bullying at school. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2013. Vol. 53. Is. 1. P. S32–S36.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
      <ref>
        <note>
          <p>35. Russell S.T., Franz B.T., Driscoll A.K. Same-sex romantic attraction and experiences of violence in adolescence. American journal of public health. 2001. Vol. 91. Is. 6. P. 903.</p>
        </note>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
